<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Tip &#8211; How To Build A Tightly Spiralled Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo blogger</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>I see, you&#039;re taking me for a newbie, Dan? :-D  I am NOT, really. )) I am relatively new to affiliate marketing, but in terms of SEO I could write a book without using any extrenal sources. No kidding ;)

What you say about the page ranking higher when a commentor name overlaps with the artcile&#039;s content, makes perfect sense to me, as comment name is an ANCHOR! And you probably know, that for good ranking not only having a lot of inbound topical links is important, but having many outbound topical links is vital too! Especially, when those links lead to artciles that expand on the content of referring artcile and provide additional related info. Hope that make sense too? :)


P.S. Wordze is a paid one and not much cheaper (40 bucks/month)  than wordtracker. So I would really use it if I needed it on regular basis.

With regard to Skype, I have an acount, but my laptop somehow doesn&#039;t like skype and keep closing it, LOL )) So we could talk on msn (windows live) messenger, if you have an account there. Mine is velant[at]hotmail.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see, you&#8217;re taking me for a newbie, Dan? <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />   I am NOT, really. )) I am relatively new to affiliate marketing, but in terms of SEO I could write a book without using any extrenal sources. No kidding <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What you say about the page ranking higher when a commentor name overlaps with the artcile&#8217;s content, makes perfect sense to me, as comment name is an ANCHOR! And you probably know, that for good ranking not only having a lot of inbound topical links is important, but having many outbound topical links is vital too! Especially, when those links lead to artciles that expand on the content of referring artcile and provide additional related info. Hope that make sense too? <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>P.S. Wordze is a paid one and not much cheaper (40 bucks/month)  than wordtracker. So I would really use it if I needed it on regular basis.</p>
<p>With regard to Skype, I have an acount, but my laptop somehow doesn&#8217;t like skype and keep closing it, LOL )) So we could talk on msn (windows live) messenger, if you have an account there. Mine is velant[at]hotmail.co.uk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1795</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1795</guid>
		<description>Hey Man, I went through the same process, funny thing is, what happens in this industry is someone mentions it on a forum, bunch of people go check it out, ....next thing you know there&#039;s these &quot;gurus&quot; telling people about the revolutionary new KW research tool called Google.

Too bad, they didn&#039;t test and research things prior to shelling out flavor-of-the-day nonsense.

I use Wordze for the rare times I need to do keyword research for true SEO purposes, it&#039;s great.

Google is first praised to the high heavens here:

http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/945/google-keyword-tool-gets-a-whole-lot-better/

Then reality sets in:

(see part under 1st screenshot of WORDZE on this post) referring to Google Sandbox as the amateurs KW Research tool.

http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/726/wordze-review-the-king-of-keywords/


Anyhoo, glad you&#039;re learning something here..

Good content is supposedly the best SEO, so I really shouldn&#039;t have to ask for a backlink, it&#039;s expected if you really do appreciate the content.

And when your content is worthy of backlinks, you can expect that, too   :)

Expect a backlink from me when I see something about LSI that&#039;s new to me, like the 2 quickest and easiest ways to build a silo-structured site with categories designed for LSI (HINT: WP plugin and Google search), and how to quickly do LSI-based keyword research for your sites, although I do think LSI is something it could take forever to figure out and could tie you up for weeks and months.

Let me know when you figure it out, or I can tell you privately how to test this out.

SKYPE me SKYPE aikidoroll

Another interesting thing I&#039;ve noticed is when blog commenters use KWs instead of their names, like (WebProsperity Review, or SEO company or something), the comment is added to that page&#039;s content, but when KWs are used as commenters&#039; &quot;names&quot; it helps the page itself rank higher if the kws for the bloggers name are similar to what the posts was on-page-SEO0ed for...?

Make sense, or are we delving too deep into the minor issues and minutiae of SEO here?

Thanks,

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Man, I went through the same process, funny thing is, what happens in this industry is someone mentions it on a forum, bunch of people go check it out, &#8230;.next thing you know there&#8217;s these &#8220;gurus&#8221; telling people about the revolutionary new KW research tool called Google.</p>
<p>Too bad, they didn&#8217;t test and research things prior to shelling out flavor-of-the-day nonsense.</p>
<p>I use Wordze for the rare times I need to do keyword research for true SEO purposes, it&#8217;s great.</p>
<p>Google is first praised to the high heavens here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/945/google-keyword-tool-gets-a-whole-lot-better/" rel="nofollow">http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/945/google-keyword-tool-gets-a-whole-lot-better/</a></p>
<p>Then reality sets in:</p>
<p>(see part under 1st screenshot of WORDZE on this post) referring to Google Sandbox as the amateurs KW Research tool.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/726/wordze-review-the-king-of-keywords/" rel="nofollow">http://www.entrepreneurs-journey.com/726/wordze-review-the-king-of-keywords/</a></p>
<p>Anyhoo, glad you&#8217;re learning something here..</p>
<p>Good content is supposedly the best SEO, so I really shouldn&#8217;t have to ask for a backlink, it&#8217;s expected if you really do appreciate the content.</p>
<p>And when your content is worthy of backlinks, you can expect that, too   <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Expect a backlink from me when I see something about LSI that&#8217;s new to me, like the 2 quickest and easiest ways to build a silo-structured site with categories designed for LSI (HINT: WP plugin and Google search), and how to quickly do LSI-based keyword research for your sites, although I do think LSI is something it could take forever to figure out and could tie you up for weeks and months.</p>
<p>Let me know when you figure it out, or I can tell you privately how to test this out.</p>
<p>SKYPE me SKYPE aikidoroll</p>
<p>Another interesting thing I&#8217;ve noticed is when blog commenters use KWs instead of their names, like (WebProsperity Review, or SEO company or something), the comment is added to that page&#8217;s content, but when KWs are used as commenters&#8217; &#8220;names&#8221; it helps the page itself rank higher if the kws for the bloggers name are similar to what the posts was on-page-SEO0ed for&#8230;?</p>
<p>Make sense, or are we delving too deep into the minor issues and minutiae of SEO here?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo blogger</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 12:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>No, I have not read that article before, but it&#039;s nice to know that have come to the same conclusion as I did, a bit earlier though :-))) 

With regard to learning and  a link - yes, I certainly learn something from your blog, as well as from many others. We all do, no matter how experienced we become, don&#039;t we? ;)
And yes, I could certainly put a link to your blog on mine, and I would also appreciate a link from this or the other (IMM) blog of yours. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I have not read that article before, but it&#8217;s nice to know that have come to the same conclusion as I did, a bit earlier though <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )) </p>
<p>With regard to learning and  a link &#8211; yes, I certainly learn something from your blog, as well as from many others. We all do, no matter how experienced we become, don&#8217;t we? <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And yes, I could certainly put a link to your blog on mine, and I would also appreciate a link from this or the other (IMM) blog of yours. <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>Right, of course that works, simple as knowing what the search engines value.  Back in the day, webmasters were metatag stuffing their sites, so the SEs make a change and gave KWs in domain name more weight, and title of sites, too.

Since you saw my Mistakes Blog, I assume you read this?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://internetmarketingmistakes.org/google-external-keyword-tool-seo-purposes-mistake&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Using the Google External Keyword Tool For SEO Purposes Is A Mistake&lt;/a&gt;

BTW, I&#039;m still #1, sometimes #3 for the KWs that site was optimized for, no big deal.

P.S. If you&#039;re learning something valuable here, a link to this blog from your SEO blog would be appreciated (HINT!, AHEM!)

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, of course that works, simple as knowing what the search engines value.  Back in the day, webmasters were metatag stuffing their sites, so the SEs make a change and gave KWs in domain name more weight, and title of sites, too.</p>
<p>Since you saw my Mistakes Blog, I assume you read this?</p>
<p><a href="http://internetmarketingmistakes.org/google-external-keyword-tool-seo-purposes-mistake" rel="nofollow">Using the Google External Keyword Tool For SEO Purposes Is A Mistake</a></p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m still #1, sometimes #3 for the KWs that site was optimized for, no big deal.</p>
<p>P.S. If you&#8217;re learning something valuable here, a link to this blog from your SEO blog would be appreciated (HINT!, AHEM!)</p>
<p> <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo blogger</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1772</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1772</guid>
		<description>Hey, it works!
My new domain http://www.discountcouponsonline.co.uk is TOP7 on its full name on Google.co.uk just 10 days after I put up a site!  And according to Yahoo it only had 4 backlinks when it got there (now - 11)!  So your assumption is working, Dan.

A drawback however is that it brings negligible traffic even being on top7 (less than a visitor a day), so as I said before Google adwords tool does not seem to give natural searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it works!<br />
My new domain <a href="http://www.discountcouponsonline.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.discountcouponsonline.co.uk</a> is TOP7 on its full name on Google.co.uk just 10 days after I put up a site!  And according to Yahoo it only had 4 backlinks when it got there (now &#8211; 11)!  So your assumption is working, Dan.</p>
<p>A drawback however is that it brings negligible traffic even being on top7 (less than a visitor a day), so as I said before Google adwords tool does not seem to give natural searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel McGonagle</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1745</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel McGonagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1745</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I used to think that, too, that Adsense is clicks for pennies when affiliate marketing is more of an art form.

Getting high-rankings is the key here,  Get top rankings for terms that get searched a lot, and let traffic come to you.  Simple.

The more I think about it,the more I see it as a true business, because I can hire anyone to do these sites just by making a few simple videos, and I can walk away from it and expect a check every month.

But if I don&#039;t email my list they&#039;ll forget about me, and even though people say they hate getting a lotof emials, if you don&#039;t send regularly, you&#039;re ruining a nicely built asset by trying to be too niche.

Anyhoo, that&#039;s marketing, Adsense sites wit hinque content might only make pennies a day, but it is more scientific...

Gather up your KWs list
Choose good domain name
Write unique articles around those KWs..
Get links to your articles /posts until you rank well.
Rinse and repeat...

Simple money-making method and really more of a true business than anything else that ties you to a computer or autorepsonder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I used to think that, too, that Adsense is clicks for pennies when affiliate marketing is more of an art form.</p>
<p>Getting high-rankings is the key here,  Get top rankings for terms that get searched a lot, and let traffic come to you.  Simple.</p>
<p>The more I think about it,the more I see it as a true business, because I can hire anyone to do these sites just by making a few simple videos, and I can walk away from it and expect a check every month.</p>
<p>But if I don&#8217;t email my list they&#8217;ll forget about me, and even though people say they hate getting a lotof emials, if you don&#8217;t send regularly, you&#8217;re ruining a nicely built asset by trying to be too niche.</p>
<p>Anyhoo, that&#8217;s marketing, Adsense sites wit hinque content might only make pennies a day, but it is more scientific&#8230;</p>
<p>Gather up your KWs list<br />
Choose good domain name<br />
Write unique articles around those KWs..<br />
Get links to your articles /posts until you rank well.<br />
Rinse and repeat&#8230;</p>
<p>Simple money-making method and really more of a true business than anything else that ties you to a computer or autorepsonder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo blogger</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1744</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1744</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the warning, Dan. As I am rather new to bloggind and to WP in particular, I didn&#039;t know about that. Will remove the calander now.

The words you were talking about are called stop-words :-)

I agree with you that having a KW rich domain helps a lot and makes site promotion so much easier. BTW, I am currently experimenting with a new KW-rich uk-domain and, if you are inetersted, will let you know in a few weeks how it is going.

As far as the Adsense business is concerned, I think that idea of having tens of sites each earning a few bucks is not that appealing to me. First of all, you would need to drive a lot of traffic even to make a few bucks a day, and that means a big load on server, most likely you would need several powerful servers to run 60+ sites, which in turn means hiring someone to maintain them plus good servers are not cheap as you know.

But those are just technical problems. The conceptual problem is that Adsense doesn&#039;t pay that much (unless you are in a very lucrative and hence rather competitive niche). I am not sure if one can make 5k/month without much investment and overheads (servers, maintainance, domains, content purchasing, perhaps even paying for link building too, as the amount of work for one person is tremendous!)

I personally have been nourishing an idea of making just a few sites that merry offer and demand (e.g. freelance jobs, buyer and sellers, students and teachers and similar kind of sites), where most of the work is done by users themselves, whereas all you need to provide is a good and effective support.

Anyway, that&#039;s me. :-) But I like your idea and determination with regard to building the adsense network, so I wish you good luck and when you succeed perhaps I could learn from you ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the warning, Dan. As I am rather new to bloggind and to WP in particular, I didn&#8217;t know about that. Will remove the calander now.</p>
<p>The words you were talking about are called stop-words <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree with you that having a KW rich domain helps a lot and makes site promotion so much easier. BTW, I am currently experimenting with a new KW-rich uk-domain and, if you are inetersted, will let you know in a few weeks how it is going.</p>
<p>As far as the Adsense business is concerned, I think that idea of having tens of sites each earning a few bucks is not that appealing to me. First of all, you would need to drive a lot of traffic even to make a few bucks a day, and that means a big load on server, most likely you would need several powerful servers to run 60+ sites, which in turn means hiring someone to maintain them plus good servers are not cheap as you know.</p>
<p>But those are just technical problems. The conceptual problem is that Adsense doesn&#8217;t pay that much (unless you are in a very lucrative and hence rather competitive niche). I am not sure if one can make 5k/month without much investment and overheads (servers, maintainance, domains, content purchasing, perhaps even paying for link building too, as the amount of work for one person is tremendous!)</p>
<p>I personally have been nourishing an idea of making just a few sites that merry offer and demand (e.g. freelance jobs, buyer and sellers, students and teachers and similar kind of sites), where most of the work is done by users themselves, whereas all you need to provide is a good and effective support.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s me. <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  But I like your idea and determination with regard to building the adsense network, so I wish you good luck and when you succeed perhaps I could learn from you <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1741</guid>
		<description>Tony, I checked your site out and was wondering why you have a calendar on your site!!!???

It&#039;s a cause for endless spider-looping, the spiders go from one day to next, to next, to next week, next week, month etc...  and besides the calendar really offers ZERO value to the visitors.

To me that&#039;s like an email marketing specialist not using AWeber or Get Response, but using a freebie autoresponder...

What gives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, I checked your site out and was wondering why you have a calendar on your site!!!???</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a cause for endless spider-looping, the spiders go from one day to next, to next, to next week, next week, month etc&#8230;  and besides the calendar really offers ZERO value to the visitors.</p>
<p>To me that&#8217;s like an email marketing specialist not using AWeber or Get Response, but using a freebie autoresponder&#8230;</p>
<p>What gives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel McGonagle</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1740</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel McGonagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1740</guid>
		<description>Tony,

Yes, it&#039;d be difficult and time-consuming to write to 60 sites daily over even weekly.  To write to 60 sites just once a month is 2 posts/day, which isn&#039;t much but a PITA when dealing with niches I know nothing about.

The idea here is to slow down the pace of the unique content addition once site is full of unique content (7-12 posts) and to continually slow it down over time.

When site is making $1.00 a day, that&#039;s $30.00/month and you can get good articles written for you for $2.00/article so your content is taken care of for half the income your sites&#039; earning.

When site&#039;s earning 3-5 bucks a day it&#039;s even better ROI, but honestly, you can get away with weekly postings at some point.

Regarding the position of my Mistakes blog, you should know that SERPs vary up and down and sometimes disappear, but right now it appears to be ranked in Google #3 for that term ( http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS304US304&amp;q=internet+marketing+mistakes&amp;btnG=Search ) behind a PR 4 and PR 3 posts, and outranking a .com site with the word &quot;my&quot; in front which seems like a limiting factor to ranking well.

At the moment it escapes me what those words are called (delimiters?) that don&#039;t lend wieght to your rankings (words like the, of, by, my if, you etc...)

Anyways, the point has been proven regarding the point that choosing the right domain name will save you a lot of time, and I am doing this with other sites as well.

Back on point, there are plenty of domain names available that will work just fine... 

heading over to namecheap.com right now...

let&#039;s see...

OK.. back...

1makemoneyonline.net AVAILABLE    
1makemoneyonline.org AVAILABLE 
makemoneyonlinenow.me  AVAILABLE 
makemoneyonlinehow.net AVAILABLE    
makemoneyonlinehow.org AVAILABLE 
dogtrainingtips.me  AVAILABLE 
earnmoneyonlinehow.net AVAILABLE    
earnmoneyonlinehow.org AVAILABLE 

I could do this all day... plenty of domain names available with inherent goodness to them for SEO.  As long as KWs are in url of domain name and title you&#039;re stacking the deck in your favor.

I&#039;m a hockey fan, and my team is the Boston Bruins.  For years, we had hard workers, &quot;plumbers&quot;, they were called... getting themselves to the playoffs almost every year but never going deep into the playofffs.

A poorly chosen domain name is sort of like that, you&#039;ll need a lot of hard work (read = backlinks) 

to accomplish what talent (read = kw-rich domain name) does easily.  Combine talent and hard work and you&#039;re golden, right?
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony,</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;d be difficult and time-consuming to write to 60 sites daily over even weekly.  To write to 60 sites just once a month is 2 posts/day, which isn&#8217;t much but a PITA when dealing with niches I know nothing about.</p>
<p>The idea here is to slow down the pace of the unique content addition once site is full of unique content (7-12 posts) and to continually slow it down over time.</p>
<p>When site is making $1.00 a day, that&#8217;s $30.00/month and you can get good articles written for you for $2.00/article so your content is taken care of for half the income your sites&#8217; earning.</p>
<p>When site&#8217;s earning 3-5 bucks a day it&#8217;s even better ROI, but honestly, you can get away with weekly postings at some point.</p>
<p>Regarding the position of my Mistakes blog, you should know that SERPs vary up and down and sometimes disappear, but right now it appears to be ranked in Google #3 for that term ( <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS304US304&#038;q=internet+marketing+mistakes&#038;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS304US304&#038;q=internet+marketing+mistakes&#038;btnG=Search</a> ) behind a PR 4 and PR 3 posts, and outranking a .com site with the word &#8220;my&#8221; in front which seems like a limiting factor to ranking well.</p>
<p>At the moment it escapes me what those words are called (delimiters?) that don&#8217;t lend wieght to your rankings (words like the, of, by, my if, you etc&#8230;)</p>
<p>Anyways, the point has been proven regarding the point that choosing the right domain name will save you a lot of time, and I am doing this with other sites as well.</p>
<p>Back on point, there are plenty of domain names available that will work just fine&#8230; </p>
<p>heading over to namecheap.com right now&#8230;</p>
<p>let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p>OK.. back&#8230;</p>
<p>1makemoneyonline.net AVAILABLE<br />
1makemoneyonline.org AVAILABLE<br />
makemoneyonlinenow.me  AVAILABLE<br />
makemoneyonlinehow.net AVAILABLE<br />
makemoneyonlinehow.org AVAILABLE<br />
dogtrainingtips.me  AVAILABLE<br />
earnmoneyonlinehow.net AVAILABLE<br />
earnmoneyonlinehow.org AVAILABLE </p>
<p>I could do this all day&#8230; plenty of domain names available with inherent goodness to them for SEO.  As long as KWs are in url of domain name and title you&#8217;re stacking the deck in your favor.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a hockey fan, and my team is the Boston Bruins.  For years, we had hard workers, &#8220;plumbers&#8221;, they were called&#8230; getting themselves to the playoffs almost every year but never going deep into the playofffs.</p>
<p>A poorly chosen domain name is sort of like that, you&#8217;ll need a lot of hard work (read = backlinks) </p>
<p>to accomplish what talent (read = kw-rich domain name) does easily.  Combine talent and hard work and you&#8217;re golden, right?<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo blogger</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>Oh yeh, absolutely!
We all learn through mistakes  in most cases anyway, so at least you now know the answer for yourself! :) 

KW-rich Domain name is great, you are right, but it&#039;s difficult to find one that would have a big volume of searches (a few thousands a month maximum), but even if you are lucky and found that, for the competitive name it&#039;s unlikely to rank well without any link building, cos other people, who have not been so clever or lucky in choosing the right name, will fight for it to rank high with an effective off-page SEO. 

So either way, it&#039;s not so easy to make a business out of just &quot;the right&quot; domain name nowadays, but your experiment was quite demonstrative!  :-) 

With reagard to the Adsense business - The fact that you decided to concentrate on 6 sites instead of 60 is definitely a good move to me, as if you can prove that the idea&#039;s working on a few sites - than it&#039;s just a question of time to sacle it up and earn more. So that’s a smart move of yourse, Dan!

The only thing that puzzles me is that it would be difficult to update 60 sites on regular basis, and, I am sure, you know that for the sites that are not updated frequently enough it is difficult to rank high especially in a competitive field. 

So I wonder what&#039;s your plan on the content development - are you planning to hire copywrites to help you with regular updates or what are your thoughts on that? 

Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeh, absolutely!<br />
We all learn through mistakes  in most cases anyway, so at least you now know the answer for yourself! <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>KW-rich Domain name is great, you are right, but it&#8217;s difficult to find one that would have a big volume of searches (a few thousands a month maximum), but even if you are lucky and found that, for the competitive name it&#8217;s unlikely to rank well without any link building, cos other people, who have not been so clever or lucky in choosing the right name, will fight for it to rank high with an effective off-page SEO. </p>
<p>So either way, it&#8217;s not so easy to make a business out of just &#8220;the right&#8221; domain name nowadays, but your experiment was quite demonstrative!  <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>With reagard to the Adsense business &#8211; The fact that you decided to concentrate on 6 sites instead of 60 is definitely a good move to me, as if you can prove that the idea&#8217;s working on a few sites &#8211; than it&#8217;s just a question of time to sacle it up and earn more. So that’s a smart move of yourse, Dan!</p>
<p>The only thing that puzzles me is that it would be difficult to update 60 sites on regular basis, and, I am sure, you know that for the sites that are not updated frequently enough it is difficult to rank high especially in a competitive field. </p>
<p>So I wonder what&#8217;s your plan on the content development &#8211; are you planning to hire copywrites to help you with regular updates or what are your thoughts on that? </p>
<p>Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>YES!  Nice to see you know what you&#039;re talking about here...

The tightly spiralled 5k/month with Adsense is coming along slowly (lots of writing) but Adsense will get turned on in about 1 week from now.  Instead of dropping all my other activities to go build 60 sites, I&#039;m working on 6 new ones right now so we&#039;ll see how that plays out in a week or two.

Regarding the IM Mistakes blog and SERPS, &lt;strong&gt;watch what I do with that site, the on-page SEO will change&lt;/strong&gt;, but I really did it to prove (once again) that the right domain name choice is the biggest shortcut to ranking well, as you probably know.

Also, I will front-end load that site with backlinks to give it some linkjuice and will use it as a backlinks generating site to my &quot;EZAs&quot;, other blog&#039;s posts, etc...

But really, I just built that site to prove how much time I wasted on trying to rank well with a squeeze page, plus it migh tbe of some use to people who think they, too, ar emaking internet marketing mistakes.

Make sense?

Thanks for the inquiry,

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES!  Nice to see you know what you&#8217;re talking about here&#8230;</p>
<p>The tightly spiralled 5k/month with Adsense is coming along slowly (lots of writing) but Adsense will get turned on in about 1 week from now.  Instead of dropping all my other activities to go build 60 sites, I&#8217;m working on 6 new ones right now so we&#8217;ll see how that plays out in a week or two.</p>
<p>Regarding the IM Mistakes blog and SERPS, <strong>watch what I do with that site, the on-page SEO will change</strong>, but I really did it to prove (once again) that the right domain name choice is the biggest shortcut to ranking well, as you probably know.</p>
<p>Also, I will front-end load that site with backlinks to give it some linkjuice and will use it as a backlinks generating site to my &#8220;EZAs&#8221;, other blog&#8217;s posts, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>But really, I just built that site to prove how much time I wasted on trying to rank well with a squeeze page, plus it migh tbe of some use to people who think they, too, ar emaking internet marketing mistakes.</p>
<p>Make sense?</p>
<p>Thanks for the inquiry,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo blogger</title>
		<link>http://danielmcgonagle.name/seo-tip-how-to-build-a-tightly-spiralled-site/comment-page-1/#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielmcgonagle.name/?p=1044#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

Good article, thanks!

How is your 5k/month with Adsense plan is going on, is the tightly spiral site idea really working for you? :)))

You also mentioned you put up a new &quot;internet marketing mistakes&quot; site and it was on page 1 in a couple of days without any backlinks, that&#039;s great! 

However, I have looked at the search volume for that keyword in Google and it&#039;s only 170 searches per month plus the site is at the bottom of page 1, so I suppose you don&#039;t get much traffic for that, do you?  

So my feeling is that counting on just the keyword-rich domain to bring sensible traffic without any SEO is probably not such a great idea, as the most competitutve domains have been bought out, and less competitive do not bring much traffic.  What do you think about this?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>Good article, thanks!</p>
<p>How is your 5k/month with Adsense plan is going on, is the tightly spiral site idea really working for you? <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ))</p>
<p>You also mentioned you put up a new &#8220;internet marketing mistakes&#8221; site and it was on page 1 in a couple of days without any backlinks, that&#8217;s great! </p>
<p>However, I have looked at the search volume for that keyword in Google and it&#8217;s only 170 searches per month plus the site is at the bottom of page 1, so I suppose you don&#8217;t get much traffic for that, do you?  </p>
<p>So my feeling is that counting on just the keyword-rich domain to bring sensible traffic without any SEO is probably not such a great idea, as the most competitutve domains have been bought out, and less competitive do not bring much traffic.  What do you think about this?  <img src='http://danielmcgonagle.name/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

